‘Drunk men made offensive gestures’: Gurgaon biker’s brother
Source Entity
LAIRENLAKPAM WARLI
Victim Shivani Chauhan, known as Siya, is demanding stricter action against Kalyan Bainsla and his accomplices in a Gurugram hit-and-run case. A local court has granted police a two-day remand to investigate the incident after video evidence led to attempted murder charges.
The Gurugram Hit-and-Run: Seeking Justice Beyond Arrest
The recent hit-and-run incident in Gurugram, involving 27-year-old biker Shivani Chauhan (known as Siya), has ignited a significant public and legal discourse regarding road safety and accountability. The incident, which occurred on September 13, 2026, on Golf Course Road, was captured by the victim's own bike-mounted camera. The footage, which shows the car driven by 33-year-old gym owner Kalyan Bainsla repeatedly attempting to maneuver alongside the victim before knocking her down, has become the focal point of the criminal investigation.
Legal Developments and Custodial Remand
Following the incident, Kalyan Bainsla and his cousin, Lovneesh (also referred to as Lavnish), fled to Rajasthan, prompting a police manhunt that eventually led to their arrest. On September 16, 2026, the duo was produced before the court of Nidhi Beniwal, which granted a two-day police remand. The prosecution argued that this time is essential to recreate the crime scene and locate other co-accused individuals who were reportedly present in the vehicle at the time of the collision.
The Victim's Demand for Accountability
Shivani Chauhan has expressed profound dissatisfaction with the current trajectory of the case. Having recorded her statement in district court, she has publicly emphasized that the arrest of Bainsla is insufficient. Her primary contention is that the other individuals present in the car must also be held accountable. She has articulated that failure to prosecute all involved parties undermines the gravity of the "attempt to murder" charge that police added after reviewing the video evidence.
Challenges to the Defense
Defense counsel Lalit Bindal has challenged the necessity of the two-day remand, noting that the accused had already been in police custody for 24 hours. Furthermore, the case has been complicated by public rhetoric; the victim has explicitly refuted claims made by Bainsla’s cousin, Kamal, who accused her of "playing the victim card." This exchange underscores the high-stakes nature of the case, where public perception and legal proceedings are deeply intertwined.
Broader Implications for Road Safety
This case highlights the growing reliance on digital evidence, such as dashcams and helmet cameras, in securing justice for victims of road violence. The severity of the incident—wherein a deliberate attempt to crowd a motorcyclist led to a life-threatening fall—has sparked concerns about road rage in urban centers like Gurugram. As the case heads toward the next hearing on September 18, the outcome will likely serve as a litmus test for how the legal system handles vehicular violence where intent is clearly documented.
Conclusion and Future Outlook
The trajectory of this case remains fluid as investigators work to reconstruct the events of September 13. With the victim demanding that the legal system avoid lenient outcomes like quick bail for the accused, the court faces pressure to ensure that the investigation is comprehensive. The eventual verdict will not only impact the lives of those involved but also set a precedent for how law enforcement addresses premeditated or reckless behavior on India's rapidly expanding road infrastructure.
Multiple Citing Sources