Gurgaon hit-and-run: Biker's father seeks attempt to murder charge against driver
Source Entity
RK LAXMI
Victim Shivani Chauhan is demanding stricter action following the arrest of Kalyan Bainsla and his cousin for a hit-and-run incident in Gurugram. Police have secured two days of custody to investigate the case, which includes an attempt-to-murder charge based on video evidence.
Analysis of the Gurugram Hit-and-Run Incident
The Incident and Legal Proceedings
On September 13, 2026, a disturbing hit-and-run incident occurred on Golf Course Road in Gurugram, where a car driven by 33-year-old gym owner Kalyan Bainsla struck a motorcyclist, Shivani Chauhan (known as Siya). The collision, captured by the victim's own bike-mounted camera, shows the vehicle approaching at speed and knocking her off her bike near the Sector 55-56 Rapid Metro station. The footage was instrumental in the police decision to upgrade the charges to include attempt-to-murder.
Police Custody and Investigation
Following the incident, Bainsla and his cousin, Lovneesh, fled the state and were subsequently apprehended in Rajasthan. On September 16, 2026, a local court presided over by Nidhi Beniwal granted the police a two-day remand to further their investigation. The prosecution, represented by the police, intends to use this time to recreate the crime scene and locate other co-accused individuals who were allegedly present in the vehicle during the assault.
Victim's Demands for Accountability
Shivani Chauhan has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the current trajectory of the legal proceedings. Despite the arrest of the two primary suspects, she argues that the current measures are insufficient. Chauhan has explicitly called for the arrest of the other individuals present in the vehicle, emphasizing that their complicity contributed to the life-threatening situation she faced. She warns that failing to hold all occupants accountable could normalize such reckless behavior on public roads.
Rebutting Victim-Blaming Narratives
Adding to the tension surrounding the case, the victim has publicly addressed disparaging remarks made by the accused’s family. Kamal, a cousin of Bainsla, reportedly accused Chauhan of "playing the victim card." Chauhan has vehemently rejected this characterization, asserting that the physical evidence—specifically the video footage—speaks for itself and that she is seeking justice for an attempt on her life, not sympathy.
Legal Defense and Future Implications
Defense attorney Lalit Bindal has challenged the necessity of the extended police remand, arguing that 24 hours of prior custody provided sufficient opportunity for investigators to recreate the scene. As the September 18 hearing approaches, the case highlights broader concerns regarding road safety in Gurugram and the efficacy of the judicial process in cases involving violent vehicular incidents. The outcome of this case will likely serve as a litmus test for how local authorities handle high-profile hit-and-run crimes supported by digital evidence.
Multiple Citing Sources