Telangana Govt constitutes high-level committee to resolve controversy over Section 22A lands
Source Entity
India Latest News: Top National Headlines Today & Breaking News | The Hindu
Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy has formed a high-level committee to resolve the Section 22A land registration controversy within 30 days. Simultaneously, he has launched a probe into alleged land ceiling violations by former CM K. Chandrasekhar Rao's family, drawing sharp demands for a judicial inquiry from the BRS.
Addressing the Section 22A Land Controversy
The Telangana government, under Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy, has taken a decisive step to address the long-standing turmoil surrounding Section 22A of the Registration Act. This legislative provision, which governs the prohibition of registration for certain lands, has historically created significant hurdles for private landowners. During a marathon Assembly session, CM Reddy traced the origins of the current crisis to administrative lapses, specifically citing the failure of previous administrations to properly sub-divide land parcels, which led to the erroneous inclusion of private properties in the prohibited list.
The High-Level Committee Mandate
To rectify these systemic errors, the government has constituted a high-level committee comprising the Law Secretary, the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), and the Commissioner of Registration and Stamps. This body has been granted a strict 30-day deadline to conduct an in-depth study and propose remedial measures. The government’s stated objective is to ensure that genuine landowners are no longer penalized by bureaucratic oversights, marking a significant shift in land administration policy in the state.
Allegations of Land Ceiling Violations
Parallel to the administrative reforms, the political atmosphere has intensified following Chief Minister Reddy's public allegations against the former BRS leadership. He has accused former CM K. Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR) and his family of amassing vast tracts of land—totaling approximately 439.3 acres—in violation of the Agriculture Land Ceiling Act. Specifically, the CM highlighted that KCR’s farmhouse in Erravelli spans 700 acres, with a substantial portion allegedly consisting of assigned lands, prompting the announcement of a fact-finding team to investigate these claims.
BRS Demands and Political Retort
In response, the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), led by Deputy Floor Leader T. Harish Rao, has pushed back against the administration's narrative. Harish Rao has demanded a judicial inquiry by a sitting Supreme Court judge into the entirety of the Section 22A issue, arguing that the government has failed to provide transparency regarding properties added to or removed from the prohibited list since December 2023. The BRS has also called for a White Paper to clarify these irregularities, framing the government's recent moves as politically motivated.
Broader Implications for Land Governance
These developments represent a critical juncture for land governance in Telangana. The intersection of administrative reform regarding Section 22A and the high-profile scrutiny of land holdings by former officials suggests a broader effort to overhaul the state’s land records. As the 30-day deadline for the committee approaches, the outcome will likely set a precedent for how the state handles legacy land disputes and the enforcement of agricultural ceiling laws.
Future Trends and Conclusion
Looking ahead, the tension between the current administration and the BRS is expected to escalate as the investigation into the assigned lands proceeds. The resolution of the Section 22A controversy will be a litmus test for the Revanth Reddy government’s efficiency in governance, while the outcome of the land ceiling probe will have significant legal and political ramifications for the former ruling party. Ultimately, the state’s ability to balance land reform with political accountability will define the trajectory of Telangana’s political and administrative landscape in the coming months.
Multiple Citing Sources
Verification Required?