Disha Salian death: 10 questions that made Bombay High Court seek a fresh CBI probe
Source Entity
Omkar Gokhale
The Bombay High Court has ordered a fresh CBI investigation into the 2020 death of Disha Salian, citing glaring procedural discrepancies. The court noted that the initial Mumbai Police probe raised more questions than it answered, necessitating a formal FIR.
Judicial Scrutiny of the Disha Salian Case
The Bombay High Court’s Directive
In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court has mandated a fresh Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the June 2020 death of Disha Salian, a former manager to actor Sushant Singh Rajput. A bench comprising Justices Sarang V. Kotwal and Ranjitsinha R. Bhonsale observed that the initial investigation conducted by the Mumbai Police was marred by "glaring discrepancies," leading the court to conclude that the circumstances surrounding the death warrant a more rigorous and transparent inquiry.
Procedural Lapses and Reasonable Suspicion
The court’s decision is rooted in a list of ten specific points of contention that have cast doubt on the original accidental death report. Among the most concerning issues highlighted by the bench are the significant delays in conducting the spot panchnama—which occurred more than nine hours after the death—and the presence of police officers at the building premises before the event was officially recorded. These procedural irregularities, combined with the delayed seizure of critical digital evidence like Salian’s phone and laptop, have created what the court described as "reasonable suspicions."
Challenges in Forensic and Investigative Integrity
Beyond the timeline of events, the court expressed concern over inconsistencies within the forensic samples and the official reporting of the death. The judiciary noted that the initial investigation failed to provide a cohesive narrative, instead leaving behind a trail of unexplained gaps that hinder the pursuit of truth. By directing the CBI to register an FIR, the High Court is seeking to address these forensic and investigative failures, ensuring that the evidence is handled with the scientific rigor required for a case of this public sensitivity.
Balancing Accountability and Legal Due Process
It is essential to note that while the High Court has ordered a fresh investigation, it has maintained a stance of judicial caution regarding premature accusations. The bench explicitly clarified that no individual should be named as an accused without sufficient, substantiated grounds. This directive serves to balance the necessity of a thorough investigation with the fundamental right to due process, ensuring that the CBI’s inquiry remains focused on uncovering facts rather than pursuing speculative narratives.
Broader Implications and Future Trajectory
The involvement of the CBI in this case marks a pivotal shift in the legal trajectory of the Disha Salian matter, which has remained a subject of intense public discourse since 2020. By elevating the probe to a central agency, the judiciary aims to restore institutional confidence and address the myriad questions left unanswered by the local police. The future of this case will now depend on the CBI’s ability to reconcile the initial investigative inconsistencies and provide a transparent, evidence-based conclusion that stands up to the scrutiny of the law.
Multiple Citing Sources