Take swift action on gender-based bullying in schools: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Source Entity
Somya Tyagi

The Gujarat government has mandated mental health support and counsellors for Classes 9-12 to address student stress and suicide risks. Simultaneously, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ordered strict compliance with anti-bullying and suicide prevention guidelines in Haryana schools.
Strengthening Student Mental Health: A New Regulatory Era
The state of Gujarat has taken a significant step toward prioritizing student welfare by mandating mental health support mechanisms for students in Classes 9 through 12. By integrating these requirements into the Gujarat Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Regulations 1974, the government is formalizing the presence of wellness teams, peer-support systems, and qualified counsellors within schools affiliated with the Gujarat Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board (GSHSEB). This initiative is a direct response to the mounting pressures of academic competition, exam-related stress, and the psychological impact of digital consumption.
Alignment with Judicial Directives
These regulations are not isolated policy decisions but are framed in strict accordance with directives issued by the Supreme Court. By adopting the UMEED guidelines, Gujarat is aligning its state-level educational framework with broader national standards aimed at suicide prevention. This shift represents a transition from viewing mental health as an optional school service to treating it as a fundamental component of the educational environment, ensuring that emotional well-being is given equal weight to academic achievement.
Addressing Systemic Bullying and Harassment
In a parallel development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a stern order to schools in Haryana, emphasizing that mental health infrastructure must be functional rather than symbolic. Justice Manisha Batra highlighted the critical need to address gender-based bullying and harassment, including discrimination based on sexual orientation. The court’s mandate requires schools to incorporate these protections into their compliance frameworks, effectively linking physical school safety with the psychological security of the student body.
The Shift Toward Proactive Intervention
Both the Gujarat government and the Punjab and Haryana High Court are emphasizing the necessity of proactive intervention. The judicial observation that instructions remaining solely on paper provide no protection to a child in distress underscores a move toward accountability. By mandating that schools follow specific guidelines—such as the 2025 Supreme Court directives and the 2021 school safety protocols—these authorities are creating a legal expectation that schools must act as safe havens for students facing mental health crises.
Future Implications and Policy Trends
As these states implement more robust mental health frameworks, the expectation for educational institutions to provide comprehensive support systems will likely become the national standard. Future trends suggest that schools will increasingly be evaluated not just on academic results, but on the effectiveness of their wellness programs and their ability to mitigate bullying. The focus on peer-support systems and professional counselling suggests a move toward holistic education, where the prevention of student distress is integrated into the daily operations of the classroom.