At Asiad, all that glitters isn’t gold
Source Entity
The Indian Express

Indian athletes at the Nagoya Asian Games are facing significant logistical challenges, including severe accreditation delays and poor facility management. These administrative hurdles have left competitors like Varun Sanyal and various team members struggling with basic needs and coaching support.
Administrative Chaos at the 20th Asian Games
The 20th Asian Games in Nagoya, Japan, have been marred by significant logistical and administrative failures that are directly impacting the performance and welfare of the Indian contingent. Reports from athletes, including MMA fighter Varun Sanyal, highlight a harrowing experience characterized by extreme travel fatigue exacerbated by poor facility management. Sanyal, who endured a multi-leg journey from London via Mumbai and Singapore, arrived in Nagoya only to face a chaotic environment where basic necessities like food and proper accommodation were reportedly unavailable for extended periods.
The Accreditation Crisis
Beyond the immediate physical exhaustion of the athletes, there is a systemic failure regarding the accreditation of support staff. The Indian karate team is heading to the competition without a dedicated coach, as repeated appeals from reigning Asian champion Alisha Choudhary to the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) and sports authorities regarding her coach, Vikas Panchal, have gone unanswered. Similarly, equestrian riders are currently stranded in Tokyo, forced to navigate an 'accreditation maze' that may require them to undertake a two-hour train journey to Nagoya just to resolve administrative oversights in person.
Impact on Athlete Performance
These logistical hurdles create an environment of uncertainty that is detrimental to high-level competition. When elite athletes are forced to spend their time navigating bureaucratic red tape or dealing with housing allocation failures rather than focusing on recovery and preparation, the integrity of their performance is compromised. For athletes like Mirabhai Chanu, who is seeking to overcome past setbacks at the Asiad, the environment surrounding the games is as much of a challenge as the competition itself.
Broader Implications for Indian Sports
India’s ambition to evolve into a global sporting superpower is currently being tested by these organizational lapses. While the nation eyes an increased medal tally that could exceed the results seen at the Hangzhou Games, the quality and nature of these achievements remain under scrutiny. The reliance on 'monopoly' sports like cricket to bolster medal counts is often viewed as insufficient for true sporting development; real progress, as noted by observers, must come from breaking fresh ground in diverse athletic disciplines.
Conclusion and Future Trends
Ultimately, the 'all that glitters is not gold' sentiment rings true for the current Indian delegation. While medals remain the primary metric of success, the administrative dysfunction highlighted in Nagoya suggests that the support infrastructure for Indian athletes is not yet keeping pace with their competitive aspirations. Moving forward, the IOA must prioritize the seamless integration of support staff and the basic welfare of athletes to ensure that their physical and mental readiness is not undermined by avoidable organizational failures.
Multiple Citing Sources