Lack of RT-PCR report no ground to deny ₹50 lakh Covid relief: HC
Source Entity
Latest News: Todays Latest News Headlines from India & World | Hindustan Times | Hindustan Times
The Allahabad High Court ruled that families cannot be denied Covid-19 ex-gratia relief due to the lack of an RT-PCR test. The court emphasized that government hospital records of antigen tests or CT scans serve as valid proof of infection.
Allahabad High Court Rules on Covid-19 Relief Eligibility
The Legal Precedent of Evidentiary Standards
In a landmark ruling, the Allahabad High Court has addressed the bureaucratic hurdles faced by families seeking ex-gratia compensation for Covid-19 deaths. The court held that the absence of a positive RT-PCR report is not a valid ground to deny the ₹50 lakh compensation if other medical evidence exists. Justices Prakash Padia and Garima Prashad emphasized that when government-run facilities document a patient’s infection via alternative means, the state cannot contradict its own medical records to avoid financial obligations.
Context of the Petitioner’s Case
The case centered on the widow of a junior engineer who served at the Obra Thermal Power Project under the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited. Despite performing essential duties throughout the pandemic, the petitioner faced difficulty securing promised relief because the official death claim lacked a specific RT-PCR confirmation. The court’s intervention highlights the friction between rigid administrative requirements and the reality of medical documentation during the peak of the pandemic.
Validating Alternative Diagnostic Methods
The government’s own policy framework previously acknowledged that RT-PCR, rapid antigen tests, and CT scan reports are all acceptable forms of diagnostic evidence. By ruling that antigen results are sufficient, the court effectively overruled the restrictive interpretation adopted by local authorities. This decision reinforces the principle that procedural technicalities should not supersede the humanitarian intent of government relief schemes designed for frontline workers.
Broader Implications for Pandemic Compensation
This ruling serves as a vital check on administrative overreach. Many families across India encountered similar obstacles where discrepancies in testing documentation led to the summary rejection of death claims. By establishing that government hospital records are inherently reliable, the High Court has provided a roadmap for other claimants to challenge wrongful denials based on missing paperwork.
Ensuring Fairness for Essential Workers
The petitioner's husband, who continued working at a power project during the crisis, represents the essential workforce that kept critical infrastructure operational during lockdowns. The court's recognition of his service and the subsequent validation of his death as Covid-related underscores the social contract between the state and its employees. This verdict ensures that the financial security promised to families of deceased frontline workers remains protected from arbitrary bureaucratic hurdles.
Conclusion and Future Outlook
Ultimately, this judgment reaffirms that the spirit of welfare legislation must prevail over narrow, exclusionary practices. As legal disputes regarding pandemic-era compensation continue to wind through the courts, this Allahabad High Court decision will likely serve as a foundational reference. It ensures that the state’s duty to provide support is not undermined by the limitations of diagnostic technology that existed during the height of the crisis.
Verification Required?