Manickam Tagore slams PM Internship Scheme, says youth need ‘genuine’ skill development
Source Entity
India Latest News: Top National Headlines Today & Breaking News | The Hindu
Congress leader Manickam Tagore has criticized the PM Internship Scheme, citing declining application numbers and low placement rates. He alleges the program is a superficial imitation of the Congress party's 'Pehli Naukri Pakki' initiative.
Critique of the Prime Minister’s Internship Scheme
Political Contention Over Youth Employment
Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president Manickam Tagore has launched a sharp critique of the Union government’s Prime Minister’s Internship Scheme (PMIS), framing it as an ineffective policy instrument. Tagore contends that the scheme lacks the depth required for meaningful skill development, arguing that the ruling BJP has merely replicated the Congress party’s 'Pehli Naukri Pakki' (First Job Guaranteed) election promise. According to Tagore, the government adopted the concept without grasping the underlying objectives necessary to foster actual employability among the nation's youth.
Analyzing the Data Trend
Central to Tagore’s criticism is the downward trajectory of engagement with the program. Citing official data from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Tagore highlighted a concerning decline in application volumes across three consecutive rounds. The figures demonstrate a contraction from 6.21 lakh applications in the initial phase to 4.55 lakh in the second, and a further dip to 3.50 lakh in the third round. This statistical decline serves as the foundation for his argument that the scheme is failing to capture the interest or trust of its target demographic.
Low Conversion and Structural Challenges
Beyond the raw application numbers, the conversion rate from opportunity to actual placement remains strikingly low. In the first round, while companies announced 1,27,508 internship opportunities, only 8,760 candidates successfully joined, representing a mere 6.9% placement rate. The second round mirrored this trend, with only 7,308 candidates filling 1,18,948 announced opportunities. Such data suggests a significant disconnect between the supply of internships and the actual demand or suitability for the youth they are intended to serve.
The Need for Substantive Policy
Tagore’s critique raises broader questions about the efficacy of top-down employment schemes versus robust, industry-integrated skill development programs. By labeling the PMIS as a copycat policy, the Congress party is signaling a strategic push to reclaim the narrative on youth employment. The underlying implication is that without structural reforms and a deeper focus on genuine skill acquisition, these internship portals may remain underutilized, failing to address the systemic unemployment challenges currently facing Indian graduates.
Future Implications and Conclusion
As the data indicates a persistent gap between government-announced opportunities and candidate participation, the future of the PM Internship Scheme appears tenuous. If the downward trend in applications continues, policymakers may be forced to revisit the scheme's design or face increasing political pressure to overhaul its implementation. Ultimately, this public discourse highlights the intense competition between political parties to define the most viable roadmap for India's workforce development, underscoring the vital role of transparent data in evaluating the success of national employment initiatives.
Verification Required?