Akhil Marar severs ties with Twenty20, levels allegations against party chief Sabu M. Jacob
Source Entity
India Latest News: Top National Headlines Today & Breaking News | The Hindu

Actor-director Akhil Marar has severed ties with the Twenty20 party following disputes over his 2026 assembly election candidacy. Marar alleges that party president Sabu M. Jacob reneged on seat promises, while Jacob has dismissed these claims as entirely baseless.
The Rift Between Akhil Marar and Twenty20: A Political Fallout
The Breakdown of a Political Partnership
The recent departure of actor-director Akhil Marar from the Twenty20 party marks a significant moment for the Kitex Group-backed political entity. Marar, who contested the 2026 Kerala Assembly elections under the party’s banner, has publicly severed his association, citing a deep-seated disconnect between his expectations and the leadership's actions. This public fallout highlights the volatility inherent in political movements that rely on celebrity endorsements and corporate-aligned organizational structures.
Disputed Promises and Candidacy Issues
At the core of the conflict are allegations regarding the allocation of assembly seats. Marar claims that his association with Twenty20 was predicated on specific commitments regarding his candidacy, which allegedly shifted from the Kottarakara seat to Tripunithura, and eventually to Thrikkakara—a constituency where the party’s electoral prospects were perceived as slim. This volatility suggests a lack of strategic alignment or a breakdown in communication between the party leadership and its high-profile candidates.
Financial Disclosures and Campaign Realities
Adding to the complexity of the narrative is the financial aspect of the campaign. Marar revealed that he personally liquidated assets, selling his motorcycle at a significant loss to finance his electoral efforts. While he acknowledged that the party eventually reimbursed these expenses, the disclosure underscores the personal financial risks candidates often take when aligning with smaller, non-traditional parties. The tension regarding these logistical and financial hurdles reflects the broader difficulties of maintaining internal party cohesion during and after a challenging election cycle.
The Leadership’s Defense
Sabu M. Jacob, the president of Twenty20, has categorically refuted the allegations leveled by Marar. By characterizing the claims as "baseless" and asserting that the party provided full funding for all its candidates, Jacob is attempting to protect the organization's reputation and maintain the integrity of its operational model. This binary conflict—a candidate's narrative of neglect versus a leader's assertion of institutional support—illustrates the classic power struggle that often defines political splits.
Implications for Twenty20’s Future
As a party backed by the Kitex Group, Twenty20 has positioned itself as a disruptive force in Kerala’s political landscape. However, incidents like this can jeopardize the party's ability to attract and retain influential figures who can mobilize voters. The perception of being "unresponsive" following an electoral defeat, as alleged by Marar, could hinder the party's growth and its ability to present a united front in future electoral battles, potentially alienating both potential candidates and the voting public.
Verification Required?